Notes:
Patrick Kelly - line 18
I know this goes against the grain of many who have Patrick listed in 1895 somewhere else. I know there are problems with this record. I still believe it to be the correct (with errors) document. Notably, I think John is accurate and Mike is not. I think Mike could be older (i.e. an adult) and possibly a cousin to and living with Patrick. (See John's baptism record.)
