Patrick Kelly - line 18
I know this goes against the grain of many who have Patrick listed in 1895 somewhere else. I know there are problems with this record. I still believe it to be the correct (with errors) document. Notably, I think John is accurate and Mike is not. I think Mike could be older (i.e. an adult) and possibly a cousin to and living with Patrick. (See John's baptism record.)
Source - https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VTQK-5NC
Patrick Kelly - Line 13
Source - Year: 1900; Census Place: North Mankato, Nicollet, Minnesota; Roll: T623_777 Page: 4A; Enumeration District: 195.
Patrick Kelly - Line 90
Source - Year: 1910; Census Place: Belgrade, Nicollet, Minnesota; Roll: T624_712; Page: 4B; Enumeration District: 103; Image: 685.
Henry Kircher - line 59
Source - Year: 1920; Census Place: Los Angeles Assembly District 72, Los Angeles, California; Roll: T625_113; Page: 7B; Enumeration District: 355; Image: 96