data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61e45/61e4525aecc31654563394b94e6a841678c83f51" alt=""
Patrick Kelly - line 18
I know this goes against the grain of many who have Patrick listed in 1895 somewhere else. I know there are problems with this record. I still believe it to be the correct (with errors) document. Notably, I think John is accurate and Mike is not. I think Mike could be older (i.e. an adult) and possibly a cousin to and living with Patrick. (See John's baptism record.)
Source - Year: 1895; Iowa, State Census, 1895; Census Place: Sioux City, Woodbury, Iowa; Page: 198
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d39c/4d39c0de89b3282dcb132c8f8d8ee19ad43855a0" alt=""
Patrick Kelly - Line 13
Source - Year: 1900; Census Place: North Mankato, Nicollet, Minnesota; Roll: T623_777; Page: 4A; Enumeration District: 195
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfa9/bbfa9ff5284be7e33cd25268c009fa350030b671" alt=""
Patrick Kelly - Line 90
Source - Year: 1910; Census Place: Belgrade, Nicollet, Minnesota; Roll: T624_712; Page: 4B; Enumeration District: 103; Image: 685.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e760/0e760eb0113f0de4819c10fc0bb8822ff0ddecc8" alt=""
Henry Kircher - line 59
Source - Year: 1920; Census Place: Los Angeles Assembly District 72, Los Angeles, California; Roll: T625_113; Page: 7B; Enumeration District: 355; Image: 96